MVI56-MCM VS MVI56-MCMR
You need to be logged in to get access to the forums. You can do so here
|
Mallen23
|
Friday 02 September 2005 2:29:19 am |
|
|
MVI56-MCM VS MVI56-MCMR
I have a MVI56-MCM module. I have tested the module in a local rack with the processor and the modbus interface to a modbus device works fine. However, when I port the project to an MVI56-MCM in a remote chassis, the module will not run and RSNetWorx gives an error message when I attempt to schedule the connection. "the amount of transmitted scheduled data for address X exceeds the maximum allowed for a sngle node" is the error message. Should I really be using a MVI56-MCMR for the remote application?
|
|
jsanders
|
Thursday 17 November 2005 9:26:42 am |
|
|
RE:MVI56-MCM VS MVI56-MCMR
The MVI56-MCMR is, overall, a better choice for use in remote rack applications.
However, the MVI56-MCM can be made to function successfully in remote racks by increasing the RPI time of the module and by increasing the Network Update Time (NUT) in RSNetworx.
|
